Posts tagged with "Nielsen"

Coca-Cola to discontinue its Spiced flavor after only seven months; new flavor coming in 2025

September 25, 2024

Coca-Cola is discontinuing production of its Spiced flavor after only seven months on the market, reports Food Dive. The  Atlanta-based company said it plans to “phase out Coca-Cola Spiced to introduce an exciting new flavor in 2025.”

No reason has been provided for the decision on Spiced. The company simply notes that Coca-Cola is “always looking at what our customers like and adjusting our range of products.”

Spiced was meant to be the Coca-Cola brand’s first permanent offering in more than three years. The soda, which combined traditional Coke flavor with raspberry and “spiced” flavors, started appearing on shelves in February.

As Coca-Cola looks to maintain and grow consumer interest in soda, new flavor offerings have played a key role in that strategy. Spiced also was an attempt by the beverage manufacturer to respond to growing consumer interest, especially among younger individuals, for spicier foods and beverages. Despite its name, Coca-Cola said the beverage is not spicy but rather bold in flavor.

In ending production of Spiced, Coca-Cola likely decided its resources and shelf space would be better suited to another still unannounced beverage.

Research contact: @FoodDive

Ex-Trump officials trash their old boss in Harris’ new attack ad

September 9, 2024

On Tuesday, September 10, Kamala Harris’ campaign will drop a new ad starring some of Donald Trump’s former senior administration officials tearing into the man they once served, reports The Daily Beast.

The montage of scathing comments from the Republican nominee’s ex-colleagues-turned-critics comes ahead of the former president’s first debate against Harris in Philadelphia. The ad will air in the city as well as in West Palm Beach—where Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort is located—along with a nationwide rollout on Fox News, according to Politico.

The ad, which is titled “The Best People,” compiles footage of Trump’s former Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, and National Security Adviser John Bolton.

The ex-officials are variously shown saying they won’t endorse Trump in the 2024 election—calling him untrustworthy, and describing him as pathologically self-interested.

“In 2016, Donald Trump said he would choose only the best people to work in his White House,” a voiceover says in the Harris-Walz ad. “Now those people have a warning for America: Trump is not fit to be president again.”

The ad then quotes Pence saying in August 2023: “Anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should, never be president of the United States.” It also includes a clip of Pence saying in a Fox News interview earlier this year that it should “come as no surprise” that he “will not be endorsing Donald Trump this year.”

Clips from Bolton speaking in interviews with CNN also made into the supercut of shame. “The only thing he cares about is Donald Trump,” Bolton says in one.

The ad further features a segment of the speech Milley gave during his last speech as Joint Chiefs chair in September 2023. “We don’t take an oath to a king or a queen or a tyrant or a dictator,” Milley says. “And we don’t take an oath to a wannabe dictator.”

“Take it from the people who knew him best,” the narrator says in the Harris’ campaign ad. “Donald Trump is a danger to our troops and our democracy. We can’t let him lead our country again.”

“To every American who understands the threat that Donald Trump poses, who cares about upholding the Constitution, who believes in the rule of law, and who knows America is stronger when it leads, there’s a home for you in Vice President Harris’ campaign,” Harris-Walz Principal Deputy Campaign Manager Quentin Fulks says.

Research contact: @thedailybeast

Trump (again) suggests he might skip September 10 debate, this time with Harris

August 27, 2024

Former President Donald Trump suggested Sunday evening, August 25, that he might skip a September 10 ABC News debate with Vice President Kamala Harris after agreeing earlier this month to participate, reports The Washington Post.\

“I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning, both lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s (K?) ridiculous and biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against Kamala Harris on that network?” Trump said in a social media post.

During a campaign stop on Monday after visiting Arlington National Cemetery, Trump reiterated his criticism of ABC News, calling it “the single worst network for unfairness” and saying that ABC “really should be shut out.”

The September 10 debate is the only one to which both campaigns have officially committed. Trump’s renewed questioning of the ABC News debate comes as Harris has increased her lead in national polls and is gaining ground in key swing states.

As of Sunday, The Washington Post’s polling average has the vice president leading in Wisconsin by three percentage points; in Pennsylvania, by two points; and in Michigan by less than one point. Trump continues to lead in four Sun Belt swing states, but Harris has significantly narrowed the gap.

The latest rift between the campaigns is about the terms and conditions about how the debate would work. Brian Fallon, the Harris campaign’s senior adviser for Communications, says that the campaign has told ABC and other networks that “both candidates’ microphones should be live throughout the full broadcast.”

“Our understanding is that Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own,” Fallon said.

When asked by a reporter on Monday whether he wanted his microphone muted, Trump replied, “Doesn’t matter to me, I’d rather have it probably on.”

Jason Miller, senior adviser to the Trump campaign, said the campaign agreed to the “the ABC debate under the exact same terms as the CNN debate,” referring to a June 27 debate between Trump and President Joe Biden, before Biden ended his reelection campaign.

That debate had no studio audience, two commercial breaks and microphones that immediately turned off when a candidate was not speaking. (Biden repeatedly appeared to lose his train of thought in that debate, drawing widespread criticism. He dropped out of the race weeks later and endorsed Harris.)

“The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements,” Miller said. The Harris campaign said that characterization was false.

It’s not the first time the former president has suggested he would back out of the ABC News debate. Earlier this month, Trump said that he would no longer appear at the September 10 debate—originally scheduled with Biden—and would debate Harris only at a September 4 debate hosted by Fox News.

However, Trump reversed course several days later and said at a news conference that he would debate Harris on ABC. Trump also proposed debates on Fox News and NBC.

Michael Tyler, communications director for the campaign of Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, put out a statement recently that said “the debate about debates is over.” In the statement, Tyler said that “assuming Donald Trump actually shows up on September 10 to debate Vice President Harris,” Walz and Senator JD Vance (Ohio), Trump’s running mate, would debate on October 1 and that another debate would occur in October.

Research contact: @washingtonpost

After I lost the election’: Legal expert says new Trump recording could be ‘admissible evidence’

June 24, 2024

The former president let the mask slip during an interview in August 2021: Donald Trump got caught forgetting his own lie—that the 2020 election was stolen from him—during an interview with journalist Ramin Setoodeh for his new book, “Apprentice in Wonderland,” according to a tape Setoodeh shared on Thursday, June 20, with MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace.

According to a report by Salon, Setoodeh, the co-editor-in-chief of Variety, told Wallace that he and Trump were discussing the latter’s falling out with his once close friend, former Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera.

As the subject came up, the presumptive GOP nominee let it slip that Rivera called him after he “lost the election,” which he then quickly corrected to say, “I won the election, but when they said we lost.”

Trump went on to belittle Rivera, who he said “called me up three or four times, and finally, I had a little time. I called him back. And he went on Fox and he started talking about, ‘The president called me.’ I didn’t call him.”

As Wallace noted, Trump, “speaking casually,”actually “admitted” that he lost. At the same time, he publicly insists that he won—a lie fervently believed by supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Setoodeh said the interview took place in August 2021.

“He was very comfortable that day because we were actually watching clips of ‘The Apprentice,’ and I think part of the reason the mask slipped off was that he was remembering his life as an entertainer. He was very amused, he was excited to see himself in the boardroom,” the author said.

“This is all performance art for Donald Trump,” he added.

At least one legal expert believes Trump’s remark could be used against him.

“This statement made on tape and on the record by … Trump would be admissible in evidence against him on the issue of his corrupt intent in the four Smith indictments in DC that SCOTUS is inexcusably keeping on hold in United States v. Trump,” Laurence Tribe, a law professor at Harvard University, posted on X.

Research contact: @x.com/Salon

‘Daily Beast’ exclusive: Trump boasted about sex with Stormy in Tahoe, athlete says

May 29, 2024

Donald Trump boasted about having sex with adult film star Stormy Daniels at the 2006 golf tournament where the two met, a celebrity athlete who played the tournament has said in an exclusive interview with The Daily Beast.

The athlete also told The Daily Beast that a decade later, in the run-up to the 2016 election, he received anonymous calls from strangers asking what he remembered of the weekend.

Stormy Daniels says she told confidantes at the time that she had sex with Trump  and has told her story repeatedly since. Trump has repeatedly denied having sex with Daniels.

Nonetheless, hush-money payments to Daniels around the 2016 election gave rise to the 34 felony counts of falsification of business records for which Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, is now on trial in New York.

However, Trump passed up the opportunity to deny sex with Daniels under oath. On Tuesday, May 28, lawyers for the former president and for the prosecution made closing arguments. The first former president ever criminally indicted, Trump could face jail if found guilty.

The celebrity athlete, who spoke to The Daily Beast on condition of anonymity, citing fear of harassment or retaliation, said he was close to Trump and Daniels while they socialized at the 2006 American Century Championship celebrity golf tournament on the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe.

Although Trump sometimes referred to Daniels indirectly as a “porn star,” the athlete said, he emphasized that it was understood among the golfers who heard the boasts that Trump, at the time best-known as the host of reality TV show The Apprentice, was saying he had slept with Daniels.

“It was clear to me and everyone who heard him that he was talking about Stormy,” the athlete said, adding that Trump encouraged other celebs to try to have sex with Daniels—behavior the athlete described as “crass,” “gross,” and “stupid.”

“He’d say all these things like, ‘You’ve gotta bang a porn star, it’s incredible,’ and, ‘It added 20 yards to my drive today,’” the athlete told The Daily Beast.

The athlete said he has not shared his story widely, and that prosecutors never approached him. His account appears to be the first publicly reported description of Trump telling people he had sex with Daniels around the time Daniels says he did.

In the hush-money trial that is wrapping up now. while Daniels’ allegation was an important plank for Manhattan prosecutors who spent the last seven weeks building a criminal case against Trump, it wasn’t central to the charges.

District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg charged the former president for allegedly falsifying business records in service of covering up another crime—an alleged attempt to keep a lid on the $130,000 Trump’s former personal “fixer” Michael Cohen illegally paid Daniels the week before Election Day in 2016, thereby to keep the story from voters and boost Trump’s chances.

In Full Disclosure, her 2018 memoir, Daniels described her alleged liaison with Trump as “the least impressive sex I’d ever had.” In court this month, she dished out salacious testimony—saying Trump had been “blocking the way” out of the bedroom, and claiming she “blacked out” during sex; although she clarified that she had not felt “threatened verbally or physically.”

At the time, Trump’s wife, Melania Trump, was nursing their newborn son, Barron Trump.

Daniels entered a non-disclosure agreement with Trump in 2016 but had previously described the alleged sexual encounter in a 2007 radio appearance—without naming Trump—and then more fully in a 2011 interview for In Touch magazine, when Trump was considering a White House run. Six years after giving her version of events in her memoir, Daniels testified to it in court this month.

Research contact: @thedailybeast

Biden campaign launches Arizona ad blitz on heels of abortion ruling

April 15, 2024

President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign launched a paid media blitz about reproductive rights in Arizona on Thursday, April 11—two days after the state’s Supreme Court upheld a near-total abortion ban  dating back to 1864, reports NBC News.

The seven-figure ad buy focuses on former President Donald Trump’s latest abortion stance, in which he again took credit for overturning the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling because of the justices he appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court and said states should decide abortion policy.

The move is part of a larger, more aggressive strategy to seize on Trump’s record on abortion, with the Biden team quickly mobilizing to respond on an issue it sees as the most motivating one for voters in November.

“Because of Donald Trump, millions of women lost the fundamental freedom to control their own bodies,” the ad opens, with Biden narrating and then saying: “Women’s lives are in danger because of that.”

The 30-second spot, which first aired Thursday on MSNBC, will target key young, female and Latino voters, both on television and online, according to the campaign.

“Your body and your decisions belong to you, not the government, not Donald Trump,” Biden says directly to the camera before he vows: “I will fight like hell to get your freedom back.”

The campaign said it hopes to reach voters in the battleground state this month with ad placements on shows like Abbott Elementary, Survivor, Grey’s Anatomy, American Idol, The Voice, and  Saturday Night Live, as well as sports events and entertainment programming on TNT, TLC, ESPN, FX, and Bravo.

“This week, women across the state of Arizona are watching in horror as an abortion ban from 1864 with no exceptions for rape, incest, or the health of a woman will soon become the law of the land for Arizonans,” campaign manager Julie Chavez Rodriguez said in a statement Thursday. “This nightmare is only possible because of Donald Trump.”

A 60-second spot released on Monday, April 8,  features a testimonial from a Texas woman who says she nearly died twice from a miscarriage because she was denied care.

At the end of that video, the ad text says: “Donald Trump did this.”

Vice President Kamala Harris is scheduled to travel to Tucson on Friday to hold a political event focused on reproductive freedom, where she plans to put Trump front and center on abortion, a Biden campaign official said.

When Biden was asked Wednesday for his message to Arizonans about the state Supreme Court’s Civil War-era ruling, he told NBC News, “Elect me,” adding that he was from the “21st century, not back then. They weren’t even a state.”

Research contact: @NBCNews

Judge orders Rep. Scott Perry to turn over cellphone records in January 6 probe

December 22, 2023

Representative Scott Perry (R-Pennsylvania) must disclose 1,659 documents to government investigators, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday, December 19—finding that the communication records were not protected by the speech or debate clause of the Constitution, reports NBC News.

The court order is the latest twist in a January 6-related investigation that has made its way through courts for months and entangled the Trump ally.

According to the NBDC report, the FBI seized Perry’s phone in 2022— before Jack Smith was appointed special counsel—as part of a federal investigation into efforts to interfere with the certification of the 2020 election. Investigators sought a second warrant to access Perry’s data but had to wait as Perry asserted speech or debate protection over 2,219 records.

Perry had said that he was “outraged” by the move and asked for the cellphone data to be returned.

A federal judge previously ruled that the majority of those records were not protected and ordered Perry to disclose them. The Pennsylvania Republican appealed that decision.

The appeals court largely upheld the judge’s order but ruled that speech or debate protection could apply in some circumstances that the lower court had rejected, requiring a re-review of the records from the district court.

In his ruling Tuesday, Chief Judge James Boasberg said that 396 of Perry’s records are protected by the speech or debate clause. The remaining records, which include messages about alleged election fraud and the role of the vice president in certifying the electoral vote count, must be turned over, the judge said.

“Having now analyzed each of the 2,055 documents still at issue, the Court will order Perry to disclose 1,659 of them, but not the 396 others,” Boasberg wrote in the 12-page filing.

The court filing alleges that Perry used his cellphone in communications that the government believes could be relevant to its investigation into the January 6 Capitol attack.

The congressman had previously argued that the Constitution’s speech or debate clause protected him from the government searching his communications—an argument mostly rejected in the latest court filing. The clause is intended to protect a member’s speech in legislative session and has been construed to protect speech beyond the session as well, according to Tuesday’s filing.

Perry has come under fire for his alleged actions after the 2020 presidential election. The January 6 committee of the House previously obtained some of his text messages in which he asked former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows about a conspiracy theory related to the 2020 election.

A lawyer for Perry said in a statement Wednesday that the congressman had an “obligation” to investigate “seemingly credible” information about “discrepancies” in the 2020 election.

“We are reviewing how the district court applied the standards required by the DC Circuit and will decide whether to seek further judicial review,” said the lawyer, John Rowley III.

Research contact: @NBCNews

‘Pharmageddon’ is coming: Thousands of pharmacists plot next walkout over work conditions

October  31,2023

Workers from some of the nation’s biggest pharmacy chains, from CVS to Walgreens, have planned another “walkout” starting Monday, October 30, as they continue to plead for better working conditions, Fox Business first reported.

They’re calling it “pharmageddon,” Shane Jerominski, a licensed pharmacist for over a decade who is helping coordinate the latest protest, told Fox.

From Monday through Wednesday workers at Walgreens, CVS, and Rite Aid have pledged to call in sick, according to Jerominski. It comes on the heels of a protest earlier this month during which employees at 200 Walgreens (out of 9,000) called out sick. Shortly before that, CVS employees in at least a dozen Kansas stores didn’t show up to work in a separate walkout.

Jerominski says workers are demanding a slate of things to ease the onslaught of duties they have taken on in recent years. Some of the biggest demands include guaranteed hours and better pay for technicians. They also want pharmacists and pharmacy managers to have a direct say in the scheduling.

The hope is that these changes will lead to better staffed stores, improve their work-life balance, and reduce the margin of error that they say could impact patient safety.

“We are a force to be reckoned with and we demand more from those who would see us and those we care for suffer,” a letter sent to Walgreens staff from organizers of “pharmaggedon” said.

It’s hard to pinpoint how many people will be involved in this latest effort, according to Jerominski. However, according to a poll posted on his social media page, The Accidental Pharmacist, over 2,000 people said, “I’m all for this no matter what.”

An additional 1,442 people said they would as long as “hundreds to thousands of pharmacists and technicians” participate, according to screenshots of the poll seen by Fox.

Aside from asking people to call out sick, Jerominski (who told Fox that he is not one of the main organizers of the walkout) also is trying to organize protests in front of CVS and Walgreens headquarters this week to make their movement more visible.

The issue is that major pharmacy chains have been unable to effectively staff their stores and pharmacies. At the same time, they have ramped up vaccine appointments, which made pharmacies fall behind on filling prescriptions, according to the pharmacist.

“Our stores are still thousands of prescriptions behind. Our patients are still going days, weeks or even months without their needed medicine. And they’re pretending that there’s not a problem,” a pharmacist, told Fox Business on Friday, October 27. “Until they acknowledge that there’s an actual problem and work to address the actual problem… we have to keep pushing.”

Amid the growing issues in the industry, a spokesperson for Rite Aid told Fox that the company is committed to “providing safe, productive and supportive work environments for all our associates; including our dedicated pharmacists, who serve our communities by providing vaccines, prescriptions, and day-to-day guidance on whole health.”

A spokesperson for CVS said it’s not seeing any “unusual activity regarding unplanned pharmacy closures or pharmacist walkouts” and that it’s working with its pharmacists to directly address any of their concerns.

Research contact: @FoxBusiness

Judge Chutkan says Trump’s right to free speech in January 6 case is ‘not absolute’

August 14, 2023

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said on Friday August 11, that she plans to issue a protective order over the handling of evidence in the Trump 2020 election interference case—saying it’s needed to protect witnesses or other interference in the trial, reports CNN.

The former president has a right to free speech, but that right is “not absolute,” the judge said at a hearing on Monday, August 7.

“Mr. Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech, but that right is not absolute. In a criminal case such as this one, the defendant’s free speech is subject to the rules,” Chutkan said.

“Without a protective order, a party could release information that could taint the jury pool, intimidate witnesses, or others involved in some aspect of the case, or otherwise interfere with the “process of justice,” she added.

This is the first hearing before Chutkan. According to CNN, she already has shown a habit of responding quickly and tersely on the docket to debates between the parties over scheduling. An Obama appointee and former public defender who has overseen several cases regarding the events of January 6, 2021, Chutkan has been outspoken about the harm the U.S. Capitol attack caused to American democracy.

How Chutkan handles the case is likely to serve as a contrast to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee in Florida who has been in less of a rush to move proceedings along in the classified documents case against the former president. She already has been heavily scrutinized for what critics say is a favorable treatment of the former president in a previous lawsuit Trump brought last year challenging aspects of the Justice Department’s investigation.

Trump pleaded not guilty to four criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election last week. The special counsel said on Thursday that he wants the trial to begin on January 2, 2024—a date that the former president’s team is expected to oppose.

Scope of protective order over evidence

In Friday’s hearing, lawyers are debating the scope of a protective order governing evidence that prosecutors say proves Trump conspired to overturn the election, interrupt Congress, and take away every American citizen’s right to have their vote counted.

Protective orders are a normal part of any criminal case and are typically approved without much drama. In this case, however, the special counsel’s office and Trump’s defense lawyers have battled in court filings over what Trump will be able to discuss publicly.

Among the restrictions the prosecutors are requesting in this case is a rule barring Trump’s lawyers from providing copies of “sensitive” evidence to the former president, including witness interviews and grand jury transcripts from the dozens of witnesses in Trump’s circle who have spoken to prosecutors.

To make their point, prosecutors pointed to Trump’s social media posts since he was indicted last week, including a vague and ominous Truth Social post reading “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” Trump also slammed Chutkan, writing in one all caps post, “There is no way I can get a fair trial with the judge ‘assigned’ to the ridiculous freedom of speech/fair elections case. Everybody knows this and so does she!”

The posts, prosecutors said, emphasized the need for a protective order that would limit whether Trump can discuss or share evidence on his social media accounts during the course of the legal case.

“If the defendant were to begin issuing public posts using details—or, for example, grand jury transcripts—obtained in discovery here, it could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case,” prosecutors wrote.

For their part, Trump’s legal team proposed less restrictive rules, alleging that prosecutors are on a politically motivated campaign to restrict his First Amendment rights. His defense lawyers pushed back on prosecutors’ definition of “sensitive” material that should be subject to additional rules, and asked to expand who can access certain evidentiary materials.

If Trump were to violate any eventual protective order Chutkan issues, he could be held in contempt.

Research contact: @CNN