Posts tagged with "Internet"

Not ‘fur real’? Amazon ‘snake cat’ photo goes viral and mystifies Internet

March 21, 2023

This unbelievable photo of an “Amazon snake cat” might be just that—unbelievable. A photo of the so-called “Serpens Catus”—a feline with black and neon-yellow stripes resembling a snake—went viral on Tuesday, March14, in social media posts, claiming it was the “rarest species of feline on Earth,” reports the New York Post.

“Serpens catus is the rarest species of feline on Earth. These Animals live in hard-to-reach regions of the Amazon rainforest and, therefore, they are relatively poorly studied,” a Twitter user claimed. “The first images capturing the snake cat appeared only in the [year] 2020. Weighs up the 4 stone [56 pounds].”

One now-deleted “Serpens Cattus” Reddit post caught the eye of several commenters who flagged the feline as not being fur real:

  • “Obvious fake No known gene can produce natural hair or fur of those (navy and bright yellow) colors,” one commenter said.
  • “Really rough attempt at a fake Latin name,” a second person chimed in. “One Google about species naming would have made this a lot less obvious.”

The Post has reached out to zoology experts to verify the authenticity of the photo.

However, the color and patterns in the photo bear a strong resemblance to the reptilian Boiga Dendrophila, which is commonly referred to as the “gold-ringed cat snake.”

According to the Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute, the snake is found in the same countries where the Amazon snake cat was rumored to be found. One viewer claimed that the species lives in Bolivia, Colombia, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela.

“He’s in the next ‘Fantastic Beasts,’ joked one user, referencing the Harry Potter spin-off franchise.

Research contact: @nypost

Dia serves the 70% of U.S. women whom the fashion industry ignores

November 21, 2018

Nearly 70% of American women—about 100 million coast-to-coast—wear a size 14 or larger, according to market research firm Houston-based Plunkett Research. But what are they wearing? Only 18% of the clothing sold in 2016 was considered plus-size, Port Washington, New York, market research firm NPD found in a recent study covered by the cable network CNBC.

On a personal level, that’s something that Nadia Boujarwah, CEO and co-founder of New York City-based Dia&Co, has realized for a long time. The former Wall Street executive says on her company’s website, “I’ve always loved fashion, but struggled to find clothes that fit my body and worked with my personal style. I’ve been everything from a size 12 to a size 22 and I couldn’t help but notice, no matter my size, that there was nothing for me.”

Indeed, she told CNBC in a recent interview, since the retail industry isn’t catering to this majority, “the average plus-sized woman is only spending 20 cents on the dollar that women in smaller sizes are spending on apparel.”

“So instead,” Boujarwah says, “I co-founded Dia&Co in 2014 [along with Lydia Gilbert], as a way for women just like me to embrace their individuality. It grew out of a personal need and now, Dia&Co is a place where everyone can explore all the incredible things that style can really do.”

The company offers clients personal styling exclusively in sizes 14 and up, as well as monthly boxes of curated plus-size clothing. A spokesperson for the company said the styling service has had more than 1 million users and ships to all 50 U.S. states.

Like the popular online retailers, Stitch Fix and Trunk Club, Dia&Co asks prospective customers to complete a profile, and then a stylist curates the items that are shipped to her. Dia charges a $20 styling fee, and the customer pays for the clothes she wants to keep.

Boujarwah told CNBC that her company is not only helping the customer find clothes, but it’s helping create clothes as well. “We do everything from work with brands to enter plus for the first time,” she said. “We build our own brands, all the way down through really creating the content and the community, to inspire her to participate.”

She added: “If you think about how many problems that are inherent” among plus-sized women, Boujarwah explained, Dia has taken “a very comprehensive view, and we’ve really said every part of this challenge for her is our job.”

Research contact: @erincstefanski

Ceding privacy for a paycheck: 78% of companies monitor employees

April 18,2018

Whether you are on the phone or computer, or in the supply closet, at work, chances are that you are being watched or recorded—or both, based on a report this week by ABCNews.Go.

According to new data from an annual workplace survey conducted by the American Management Association, nearly 80% of major companies now monitor employees’ use of e-mail, Internet or phone.

That figure represents a substantial uptick from 1997, when just 35% of businesses kept tabs on their workers—although employees have the same access now to email and the Internet that they had 20 years ago.

The AMA study was conducted among 1,627 large and mid-sized firms that are its members and clients—and  which, cumulatively, employ over 25%r of the U.S. workforce.

The survey also found that companies have increased monitoring across the board within the past couple of decades. Sixty-three percent now watch Internet usage and 47% review e-mails—a significant increase from 54% and 38%, respectively, in 1997.

In addition, more companies today are blocking social media and other sites that they deem inappropriate, in an effort to control employee “offenses”—and fully 25% say that they have fired employees for misuse of business email or the Internet.

“It’s not just a matter of corporate curiosity, but very real worries about productivity and liability that push these policies,” Eric Rolfe Greenberg, director of Management Studies for the AMA, told ABC.

“Personal e-mail can clog a company’s telecommunications system, and sexually explicit or other inappropriate material downloaded from the Internet can lead to claims of a hostile work environment,” he added.

Typically, the larger the company, the more incentive it has to check up on its employees, the survey found.

The financial sector — banks, brokerages, insurance and real estate — was the most vigilant, reporting that 92.1% of firms participate in some form of surveillance.

More than three-quarters of those who work in wholesale and retail, manufacturing, business and professional services and other non-profit organizations also were subjected to surveillance.

Finally, the AMA said that most companies tend to carry out spot checks rather than monitor workers constantly. However, that’s little comfort to employees, for whom the right to privacy has been ceded in exchange for a paycheck.

Research contact: customerservice@amanet.org