March 8, 2023
You’ve heard stories about twins separated at birth who unwittingly go on to live similar lives—but what about doppelgangers who aren’t closely related by blood, but just look incredibly alike? Do you have one, and just how similar is he or she, beyond just looking like you?
A one-two punch of a fascinating photography project and a follow-up scientific study tackles these very questions, reports Futurism.
Brunelle’s photos caught the eye of geneticist Manel Esteller at the Leukemia Research Institute in Barcelona, Spain. Together, they tracked down 32 pairs of lookalikes whom Brunelle then photographed. Esteller got their DNA samples and, with a team of researchers, put their photos through three different facial recognition algorithms to determine which pairs were the most similar, narrowing it down to 16.
But that’s not all. Beyond just being lookalikes, the study found that the doppelgangers also tended to act alike—at least in the sense that they had similar education and smoking habits. Height and weight, too, were close between pairs.
While it may seem like common sense that people who look alike share more similar genes than those who don’t, Esteller says it had “never been shown”—until now.
It’s a more complicated question than it seems, and involves the bafflingly complex world of epigenetics, or how genes express themselves. The expression of genes plays a sizable role in how you look, and can be affected by environmental factors in a person’s upbringing—or even, some scientists now believe, by hisor her ancestors’ experiences.
Just how much of a role is hard to quantify, but the findings of the study seem to show that the genomes themselves, rather than the expression of the contained genes therein, plays the larger role.
“Thus, nature is very strong, but nurture tunes up the genome a little bit,” Esteller said to Gizmodo.
Logically, it comes down to sheer numbers. With billions of people in the world, there’s bound to be someone out there by pure chance that looks like you, right?
Strongly linking DNA to appearances and behavior could obviously have some useful medical implications—like using physical indicators to assess a patient’s risk of disease—but it could just as easily have some damaging ones too, bordering on detestable practices like eugenics and phrenology.
Still, it’s no doubt an intriguing revelation — just one that needs to be approached with caution.
Research contact: @futurism